
So, these three are my “main” prime go-to lenses. I also have the 14 2.8, but for this blog post’s purpose, I’ll just stick with these three for the examples. Often, people are looking around to find the best lens to get for their needs. In any case, whatever. Basic rule of…







Traci Manges - I would go with the 85 even with the heavier price tag, the picture taken with that lens just "pops" where as the other ones something is just missing.
robbdavidson - You’re absolutely right Traci. That is why I will always be an advocate for that lens!
Jon Merkel - I have the 135 and have used the 85 quite a lot. Apart from image quality and price there are other things to consider. Focusing on the 85 is SUPER slow when compared to the 135, and if you into Manuel focusing for things like free-lensing the 85 can't work without the electronics. The 135 is also capable of using a 1.4 adapter bringing it to 2.8, so it becomes a great sharp lens choice over the 70-200 when needed with just a few hundred bucks. The 85 is a jewel and tends to be used sparingly…it is pretty though.
Robb Davidson - Sure, the 85 is certainly slower, which sometimes I need to do on shoots. It's not for sports, that's for sure. It kinda forces me to take my time just a hair longer, and make sure things are set. Same argument can even be made with using film over digital…you are more methodical in each shot instead of just firing away all trigger happy. So in that case, take forever to focus, just nail the shot and eat all the yumminess it produces.